Friday, June 17, 2011

The top 5 stereotypes about vegans: Are they true?

I wrote the below article this week for my examiner.com column, but wanted to post it here too since I thought it was important.  Enjoy!

When you hear the word “vegan”, what do you think?  Do you automatically think you know something about that person?  Do you categorize that person in your mind?  Are your associations positive or negative?  There are many stereotypes out there about vegans, but, as with most groups of people, it’s very difficult to categorize and often your assumptions are far from the truth.  Here are the top five stereotypes and the truth about each.

  1. Vegans are all skinny.  I, for one, fervently wish this were true, but unfortunately taking animal products out of your diet doesn’t automatically make you drop weight.  There are many “junk food vegans” out there who love their processed foods and sweet treats.  Oreos and potato chips are vegan.  And while I certainly wouldn’t recommend eating these items exclusively, it can be difficult to turn down all the yummy vegan goodies like cupcake recipes all over the web.  Whole Foods in north Scottsdale carries Fabe’s Bakery mini double chocolate chip cookies that are vegan and don’t even contain sugar.  Need I say more?
  2. Vegan diets are based on deprivation.  Vegans don’t eat animal products, but that doesn’t mean that a plant-based diet is about exclusion.  New vegans often discover foods that they had never tried or maybe never even heard about in the past, and these foods become new favorites.  American diets are very much focused around meat and dairy, with plant-based foods considered secondary or “sides”.  When these foods become the centerpiece, however, there’s a lot more energy put into making them unique and delicious.  My vegan mac and cheese (based on the VegNews recipe) has become a favorite among vegans and omnivores alike.
  3. Vegans are difficult to please and demanding.  It’s true that vegans often need to ask for slight dietary changes at most restaurants, but savvy vegans know that friendliness and appreciation go a long way toward changing this stereotype.  In fact, many vegans offer to bring homemade dishes to dinner parties so that the host doesn’t need to do anything.  Restaurants increasingly have plant-based options which makes it even easier for vegans to dine out.  If you’re still not convinced, attend one of the next VEG Phoenix meet-up events and judge for yourself.  Omnivores are always welcome.
  4. All vegans are animal activists.  This is a controversial topic among vegans.  While some believe that you can’t be a “true” vegan unless you are motivated by the welfare of agricultural animals, an increasing number of vegans have adopted a plant-based diet for dietary benefits or environmental reasons.  In fact, a large number of vegans don’t like the word “vegan” and don’t refer to themselves this way at all.  It’s true, however, that a great many vegans are committed to animal welfare issues and seek to end cruel factory farming practices. 
  5. Vegans don’t get enough energy and can’t be hard-core athletes.  Tell this to Carl Lewis, the Olympic sprinter and long-jumper.  Or Ruth Heidrich, a 6-time Ironman Triathlon finisher who has won more than 900 medals and is now in her 70s.  And there are countless athletes from various sports around the world who achieve greatness on a vegan diet.  The fact is that a plant-based diet provides all nutrients needed to succeed at any level of fitness.
Vegans are as diverse as the plant-based ingredients they consume every day.  Ask vegan friends and family about their experiences.  You may be surprised by their answers.


3 comments:

  1. Thanks for trying to bust some myths.

    I'm a bit worried about #4: "All vegans are animal activists." You say that like it's a bad thing? Is it possible that you have fallen prey to a stereotype idea of what an animal activist is? Otherwise why would you try to counter the idea? Being an animal activist is a very positive thing - it means speaking up for other beings, and not just the ones caught in agribusiness, but wild animals and their habitats too.

    It's sad to hear that some who eat a vegan diet are trying to dissociate themselves from the word 'vegan.' The word was founded in 1944 by a group of dedicated people who had a specific meaning in mind: complete abstention from all animal products in order to respect other animals. Health and environmental concerns are completely valid facets of this philosophy, but 'vegan' is what 'vegan' is! I think it's something to be proud of, not to shy away from!

    It's also worth noting that in 1944, there were no factory farms yet - vegans were protesting against all kinds of animal use, not just factory farms. Even the smallest family farm is host to cruelty and death, and will be as long as we think animals are ours to keep and use. Donald Watson - the main organizing force behind the vegan movement at that time - turned away from animal products after witnessing the slaughter of a pig at his uncle's (family) farm.

    I think #2 was really spot-on, and I'm glad you emphasize how the world of food opens up once one excludes animal products. Most vegans I know - to stereotype a little - start to get really into food and how to prepare it! :) VegWeb is a great example.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @veganactivist: thank you so much for your comment. I completely agree with you that being an animal activist is a positive thing - I've been one all my life and it's the reason I went vegan. These stereotypes come from multiple conversations that I've had with omnivores and they aren't all bad!

    It seems that, as the vegan population is growing, there's a category of people avoiding the word "vegan". These people tend to stay away from animal products for health reasons only - not the same reason most of us became vegan. Now that raises the debate as to what a vegan really is and whether one needs to be motivated to end animal suffering to qualify.

    In my opinion, people can call themselves whatever they'd like as long as they give up the animal products (in all things - not just food), and my goal is to make the concept more friendly and less threatening to the mainstream.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I guess so! Do you think there's a danger that people might miss the 'meaning' of veganism, if they go in it for health-only reasons?

    I know a friend who was advised by a naturopath to go on a 'vegan cleanse.' I think it was six weeks. The person wasn't healed as a result of the vegan cleanse, and went back to an omnivore diet (mind you, a very healthy one). What this person needed wasn't a cleanse, but lifestyle changes and maybe a weekend away from their stressful life! I guess I worry that there is so much trendy-ism in our culture regarding health that people might 'move on' to the next thing if veganism isn't the instant cure-all they hope it will be.

    Your thoughts?

    On the other hand, I'm sure we can agree that there are people who are attracted by the health benefits, and stay for the ethical reasons. I do hope that people don't give up the name, because the name conveys a meaning. You are right that anyone who gives up animal products is benefiting animals, whether that's their intention or not!

    I think you are doing excellent work trying to make veganism 'more friendly and less threatening' by trying to counteract the harmful stereotypes that follow it and by showing that veganism is accessible, sane, and life-sustaining.

    ReplyDelete